"Every new generation needs to redefine 'right' and 'wrong' in its own terms and according to the

P.S These issues(45 min) and Arguments(30 min) tasks were written timed. These are first drafts and the topics were extempore.

Argument-4

"Every new generation needs to redefine 'right' and 'wrong' in its own terms and according to the conditions of its own time."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The most astonishing function of the human body is that it easily co-exists or co-operates with any changes in its surroundings. The human body adapting to its surroundings is a fact that puts forth the cardinal trick of living happily. Adopting things with respect to the time is the best way a man can live a right life.

The world has seen a vast change in the last few hundred years. There was the industrial revolution. The technological advancement. Analog devices were made digital and the world of computing took a great turn. This suggests that new improvisation ought to come and we need to adopt with that. A man using abacus today is termed a fool when there are super computers to compute the hardest of complex data.

The issue of "right" and "wrong" of the things we do is totally dependent on the circumstances and conditions as said by the argument. As per the India's religious belief a true Indian must not sail in the ocean. This was framed as in those olden days it was not safe to travell in the sea. Travelling in sea was considered "wrong" by them. But now as there are technological advancement, travelling in sea is safe. Now this mythology of travelling in sea was approved. This is the way in which we need to redefine the things as right and wrong. This argument lacks evidence like this to support its statement.

In the olden days there were kingdoms. Many kings use to fight with each other for a piece of land. There were big battles and decimations for the piece of land. Though this was a cruel act it was termed "right" those days. Now, the newer generation with higher intellect criticize this act and are striving for unity among all the countries throught the world. Now the situation has changed which apposes the act of battles for land and terms it "wrong". Organizations such as the United Nations are set up to achieve world peace. This gives a much stronger evidence which supports the argument.

The era in which we live is full of mutations. Even the soft wares we use go in for newer versions. People also prefer the newer forms than their older counterparts. This makes a statement that the new generations are with people who redefine things with time. This argument would have been stronger if it gives more supporting statements such as a study, a research or at least an example. This statement with the above said features would be more cogent compared to the one given.